EDID: Print 1152x864 in established timings, not x870
The spec says x870, but we actually use x864 because that's a real DMT mode and x870 isn't. This might or might not be wrong, but we should at least tell the truth.
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									2a806d7fa3
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						2c1a845521
					
				| 
						 | 
					@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ print_established_timings(int scrnIndex, struct established_timings *t)
 | 
				
			||||||
    if (c&0x02) xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex,X_INFO,"1024x768@75Hz\n");
 | 
					    if (c&0x02) xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex,X_INFO,"1024x768@75Hz\n");
 | 
				
			||||||
    if (c&0x01) xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex,X_INFO,"1280x1024@75Hz\n");
 | 
					    if (c&0x01) xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex,X_INFO,"1280x1024@75Hz\n");
 | 
				
			||||||
    c=t->t_manu;
 | 
					    c=t->t_manu;
 | 
				
			||||||
    if (c&0x80) xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex,X_INFO,"1152x870@75Hz\n");
 | 
					    if (c&0x80) xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex,X_INFO,"1152x864@75Hz\n");
 | 
				
			||||||
    xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex,X_INFO,"Manufacturer's mask: %X\n",c&0x7F);
 | 
					    xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex,X_INFO,"Manufacturer's mask: %X\n",c&0x7F);
 | 
				
			||||||
}
 | 
					}
 | 
				
			||||||
  
 | 
					  
 | 
				
			||||||
| 
						 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue