When the owner of a touch accepts it, the other listeners must
receive a TouchEnd.
Even though there's code implementing the logic above in
ProcessTouchOwnershipEvent(), DeliverTouchEndEvent() was refusing to send
those TouchEnd events in this situatuation.
Signed-off-by: Daniel d'Andrada <daniel.dandrada@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
exevents.c: In function 'DeepCopyFeedbackClasses':
exevents.c:272:20: warning: declaration of 'classes' shadows a previous
local [-Wshadow]
exevents.c:245:16: warning: shadowed declaration is here [-Wshadow]
(and a few more like this)
exevents.c: In function 'DeliverTouchEmulatedEvent':
exevents.c:1442:27: warning: declaration of 'win' shadows a parameter
[-Wshadow]
exevents.c:1404:55: warning: shadowed declaration is here [-Wshadow]
exevents.c:1475:28: warning: declaration of 'listener' shadows a parameter
[-Wshadow]
exevents.c:1403:62: warning: shadowed declaration is here [-Wshadow]
xiselectev.c: In function 'ProcXISelectEvents':
xiselectev.c:178:34: warning: declaration of 'dummy' shadows a previous
local [-Wshadow]
xiselectev.c:91:18: warning: shadowed declaration is here [-Wshadow]
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
This is only called from the enterleave implementation, so move it and its
helper functions to there. No functional changes.
Fixes build error introduced in 31174565ec if
building with '-Werror=implicit-function-declaration'
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@apple.com>
If a touch is physically active, the pointer core state should reflect
that the first button is pressed. Currently, this only occurs when there
are active listeners of the touch sequence. By moving the device state
updating to the beginning of touch processing we ensure it is updated
according to the processed physical state no matter what.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Currently, the touch is only logically ended if the touch has physically
ended. If the touch hasn't physically ended, the touch record is never
ended. If there aren't any more listeners, we don't need to keep the dix
touch record around any more.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
As a special case, if a still physically active pointer emulated touch
has no listeners and the device is explicitly grabbed for pointer
events, create a new dix touch record for the grab only.
This allows for clients to "hand off" grabs. For example, when dragging
a window under compiz the window decorator sees the button press and
then ungrabs the implicit grab. It then tells compiz to grab the device,
and compiz then moves the window with the pointer motion. This is racy,
but is allowed by the input protocol for pointer events when there are
no other clients with a grab on the device.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The function will be used for building a sprite for pointer emulation
after an explicit device grab. This commit refactors the code so that
TouchBuildSprite will function with any event type and moves the checks
to the caller.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Fake touch end events are generated by touch acceptance and rejection.
These should not cause implicit pointer grabs to be deactivated.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Fake end events are generated by touch acceptance or rejection. These
should not end the touch point.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We still need to generate the touch ownership event to process the
ending of the touch event in the case where the owner has the end
already.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is a bit of unimplemented code for touchscreen pointer emulation. A
pointer grabbing client currently never accepts the touch sequence. The
sequence must be accepted once any touch-derived event is irrevocably
delivered to a client.
The first pointer event, derived from a touch begin event, may be caught
in a sync grab and then replayed. This is essentially a revocable
delivery of an event. Thus, we must wait till a non-begin event is
delivered.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The current code returns a reference to memory that may not actually be
an XI2 mask. Instead, only return a value when an XI2 client has
selected for events.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@apple.com>
Acked-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The current code checks the core event mask as though it were an XI2
mask. This change fixes the checks so the proper client and event masks
are used.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@apple.com>
Acked-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Issue:
* Two sequential touches (i.e. down, up, down, up)
* Both are grabbed by a touch grab
* Both have a second listener in the form of a pointer grab or selection
* The second and first touches are rejected in that order
The first touch must be pointer emulated before the second touch, so the
second touch must be paused until the first touch is rejected or
accepted and all events are delivered to pointer clients.
This change ensures all pointer emulated events are emitted
sequentially. It necessarily imposes a delay on further touch events
when pointer grabs and selections are used, but there is no way around
it.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Just like when we deliver to a touch listener, we must convert a touch
end event to an update event for further clients. This also ensures that
the touch record is not deleted at the end of ProcessTouchEvent().
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
After the pointer grab is deactivated, the touch listener record is
updated at the end of DeliverTouchEmulatedEvent. However, the touch
record is ended when the grab is deactivated, so the update to the
listener record is in an array of memory that has been freed.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Preparation work for per-device idle counters.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@apple.com>
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp <jamey@minilop.net>
Reviewed-by: James Jones <jajones@nvidia.com>
If there is only one listener of a touch, the listener is a grab, and is
accepted before the touch has ended, the current code will not end the
touch record when the touch does end.
This change adds a listener state for when a touch is accepted but has
not yet ended. We now keep the touch record alive in this state, but end
it when the touch ends.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is strictly the application of the script 'x-indent-all.sh'
from util/modular. Compared to the patch that Daniel posted in
January, I've added a few indent flags:
-bap
-psl
-T PrivatePtr
-T pmWait
-T _XFUNCPROTOBEGIN
-T _XFUNCPROTOEND
-T _X_EXPORT
The typedefs were needed to make the output of sdksyms.sh match the
previous output, otherwise, the code is formatted badly enough that
sdksyms.sh generates incorrect output.
The generated code was compared with the previous version and found to
be essentially identical -- "assert" line numbers and BUILD_TIME were
the only differences found.
The comparison was done with this script:
dir1=$1
dir2=$2
for dir in $dir1 $dir2; do
(cd $dir && find . -name '*.o' | while read file; do
dir=`dirname $file`
base=`basename $file .o`
dump=$dir/$base.dump
objdump -d $file > $dump
done)
done
find $dir1 -name '*.dump' | while read dump; do
otherdump=`echo $dump | sed "s;$dir1;$dir2;"`
diff -u $dump $otherdump
done
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Acked-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
The VCP may have active touch grabs. The touch records must be kept so
these touch grabs may be accepted/rejected in the future. This means the
touch class list will not represent the touch class of the attached
slave device if it does not have a touch class, but we already were
breaking that assumption by keeping a separate touches array for the
VCP.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The VCP has its own touches array, don't overwrite it when the class is
copied from the SD to the master.
Reported-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
In this case, we have ended the touch because the last owner has
rejected it. We need to return from the function right now so we don't
attempt to dereference another touch client for early acceptance
processing.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@ubuntu.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Similar to the fix in fcda98c486. This
ensures we show the correct logical state of the buttons in device focus
events too.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This doesn't really implement early accept as it should. Ideally, the
server should send end events to all subsequent touch clients as soon as
an early accept comes in. However, this implementation is still protocol
compliant. We can always improve it later.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This function is mostly correct for early reject usage. With a small
change to pass the client resource explicitly and making the
TouchOwnership event optional, it is usable for all rejection scenarios.
This change exports it for use outside Xi/exevents.c and modifies the
name accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The server often needs to generate and deliver TouchEnd events for
circumstances including touch grab acceptance and rejection. This change
refactors the code so it can be used more easily.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The current code short-circuits around the block that removes the
rejecting listener if it is the only listener left. It also does not
delete the touchpoint record if the touch has not physically ended.
This change ensures the listener is removed under these circumstances.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@ubuntu.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
A touchpoint is ended when no further processing will take place for it.
This includes the situation where there is only one grabbing client, and
the client receives a touch end before it has accepted/rejected the
touchpoint.
This change ensures that a delivered touch end event is converted into a
touch update event under the above scenario. If the event is left as a
touch end event, the touchpoint will be ended in ProcessTouchEvent().
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If the device is already grabbed, don't activate the passive grab, it screws
with our event masks. Just deliver to the grabbing client instead.
Reported-by: Carlos Garnacho <carlosg@gnome.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Ownership changes don't get processed directly when they happen, instead the
DIX submits an ownership event which goes through ProcessTouchEvents and
ProcessTouchOwnershipEvents.
Then on the required events are generated and sent to clients.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Includes a hack for implicit grab activation, because integrating this
requires a larger rewrite and I'm not sleeping enough as it is.
Right now, we deliver the event and check before/after if there is an
implicit grab on. If one activated, then store the event in the grab and
switch the listener type to a grab listener.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Does not include pointer emulation handling.
Does include partial ownership handling but not the actual processing of
ownership events.
Note: this commit is a retroactive commit extracted from a series of ~50
commits and may thus appear a bit more complicated than what you'd write out
from scratch.
Pointer processing tree is roughly:
- ProcessOtherEvents
- ProcessTouchEvents
- DeliverTouchEvents
- DeliverTouchBeginEvent|DeliverTouchEndEvent|...
- DeliverOneTouchEvent
Also hooks up the event history playing to the right function now.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Co-authored-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Update the logical button state for pointer-emulating events. Button state
must be kept separate from the ButtonClassRec to avoid clearing the button
state on a touch end if there is a physical button still down.
And obviously don't change the button state if we're currently replaying the
event history for some client.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
These structs will be used to store touch-related data, events and
information.
Drivers must call InitTouchClassDeviceStruct to set up a multi-touch capable
device.
Touchpoints for the DDX and the DIX are handled separately - touchpoints
submitted by the driver/DDX will be stored in the DDXTouchPointInfoRec. Once
the touchpoints are processed by the DIX, new TouchPointInfoRecs are created
and stored. This process is already used for pointer events with the
last.valuators field.
Note that this patch does not actually add the generation of touch events,
only the required structs.
TouchListeners are (future) recipients of touch or emulated pointer events.
Each listener is in a state, depending which event they have already
received. The type of listener defines how the listener got to be one.
Co-authored-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
No-one can generated them yet, but if they could, we'd be processing them
like there was no tomorrow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
The are the same as device events internally but require the touch ID
separately from the detail.button field (the protocol uses the detail field
for the touch id).
For simpler integration of pointer emulation we need to set the
detail.button field while keeping the touchid around.
Add the three new touch event types to the various places in the server
where they need to be handled. The actual handling of the events is somewhat
more complicated in most places.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
All the DeepCopy stuff really needs to be shared between the init calls the
drivers use and this code here. Too many bugs by not keeping the two in
sync.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
They achieve the same thing, re-use the more generic InputLevel so we can
convert to/fro easier.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Functional change: for a button mapped to 0, the motionHintWindow is not
updated to the NullWindow anymore. Before it got updated unconditionally to
the button mapping. I have no idea what the practical effect of this is, but
I guess it's closer to the correct behaviour: pressing a button that's
logically disabled now does not disrupt the motion hint delivery.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
'state' is shadowed by the XKB 'state' as well (which feeds into the event
too), so rename this one to clarify that this is the core event state only.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Once grabs start having nested memory locations, we can't just use the
GrabRec on the stack anymore, we need to alloc/copy/free the grabs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Does what it says on the box, complements MakeInputMask.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Currently not needed since the InputClientRec is a self-contained struct. As
part of the touch rework that won't be the case in the future and a function
to allocate/free memory appropriately is required.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Wherever it's obvious which device we need (keyboard or pointer), use
GetMaster() instead of GetPairedDevice(). It is more reliable in actually
getting the device type we want.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
They don't have a KeyClassRec, but we must still allow passive grabs on
them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Tested-by: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
If we're sending the event for a given device, make sure the deviceid is
that of the device.
This allows callers to use the same DCE for slave and master without having
to fiddle the DCE's internal fields.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Instead of device and master (and just using master), drop the master
argument and let the callers pass in the device the event is to be sent for.
No effective functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
For scroll wheel support, we used to send buttons 4/5 and 6/7 for
horizontal/vertical positive/negative scroll events. For touchpads, we
really want more fine-grained scroll values. GetPointerEvents now
accepts both old-school scroll button presses, and new-style scroll axis
events, while emitting both types of events to support both old and new
clients.
This works with the new XIScrollClass to mark axes as scrolling axes.
Drivers mark any valuators that send scroll events with SetScrollValuator.
(Currently missing: the XIDeviceChangeEvent being sent when a driver changes
a scroll axis at run-time. This can be added later.)
Note: the SCROLL_TYPE enums are intentionally different values to the XI2
proto values to avoid copy/overlapping range bugs.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Relative axes are initialized with 0, -1 but so far this never had any
effect as all users of this function (for relative axes) just set it to the
defaults anyway.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Return errors instead of silently ignoring them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Change the DeviceEvent InternalEvent to use doubles for its valuators,
instead of data and data_frac.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
exevents.c: In function 'UpdateDeviceState':
exevents.c:719:9: warning: variable 'bit' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
exevents.c: In function 'ProcessOtherEvent':
exevents.c:889:22: warning: variable 'v' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
exevents.c:888:17: warning: variable 'k' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
No functional changes, prep work for future changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@apple.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@apple.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
The macro is sufficient if called during a development cycle, but not
sufficient information when triggered by a user (e.g.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688693).
Expand what this does to print the event content and a backtrace, so at
least we know where we're coming from. Only the first 32 bytes are printed
since if something goes wrong, the event we have is almost certainly an
xEvent or xError, both restricted to 32 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
commit 678f5396c9 only fixed the
initialization, not the copy. After a slave device change, the valuator
were out of alignment again.
X.Org Bug 36119 <http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36119>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@apple.com>
This removes the struct, but keeps InitAbsoluteClassDeviceStruct as
a no-op and preserves related struct layout.
Signed-off-by: Simon Thum <simon.thum@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is not a straightforward search/replacement due to a long-standing
issue.
dev->u.master is the same field as dev->u.lastSlave. Thus, if dev is a master
device, a check for dev->u.master may give us false positives and false
negatives.
The switch to IsFloating() spells out these cases and modifies the
conditions accordingly to cover both cases.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <tissoire@cena.fr>
These two were sideeffects of lastSlave being in the same field as the
master. For devices generated by the master device directly, lastSlave was 0
and the device would (with the old checks) be interpreted as floating.
Add the required checks to safeguard against master devices.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <tissoire@cena.fr>
When a client has selected for Xi 1.x DeviceStateNotify events, they
should receive them when a DeviceFocusIn event is generated. The code
to do this was there, but an incorrect test meant they were never being
sent.
The "type" passed in is the XI2 type, the XI1 type is in event.type.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
CheckDeviceGrabs will activate a passive grab for KeyPress and
ButtonPress events. GrabInfoRec::activatingKey contains the keycode
which activated the passive grab, so we can deactivate it later in
ProcessOtherEvents.
Previously, CheckDeviceGrabs relied on its callers to set
activatingKey, which not all callers were doing (I'm looking at you,
ComputeFreezes). Just set it in CheckDeviceGrabs instead.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Since FixUpEventFromWindow only uses the sprite trace to determine the
window stack, pass in a sprite instead of hardcoding the device sprite,
so we can deliver to windows other than the one currently containing the
sprite.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
It is currently assumed that an event button delieved to a master device
corresponds to the slave button states. However, the event button is a
logical (mapped) slave button and slave button states correspond to
physical (unmapped) slave buttons. This leads to incorrect update of the
master button state and incorrect events devlivered to clients. Fix the
situation by taking the slave button map into account when querying a
slave button state.
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24887
Signed-off-by: Eoghan Sherry <ejsherry@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We have per-axis mode now. For those bits that still need it (XI 1.x),
assume that the first axis holds the device's mode.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Previously the OutOfProximity bit in the valuator mode.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
The XI2 protocol supports per-axis modes, but the server so far does
not. This change adds support in the server.
A complication is the fact that XI1 does not support per-axis modes.
The solution provided here is to set a per-device mode that defines the
mode of at least the first two valuators (X and Y). Note that initializing
the first two axes to a different mode than the device mode will fail.
For XI1 events, any axes following the first two that have the same mode
will be sent to clients, up to the first axis that has a different mode.
Thus, if a device has relative, then absolute, then relative mode axes,
only the first block of relative axes will be sent over XI1.
Since the XI2 protocol supports per-axis modes, all axes are sent to the
client.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
RegisterPointerDevice() and RegisterKeyboardDevice() were already mapped to
RegisterOtherDevice() and obsolete.
RegisterOtherDevice() was called for all devices and the two assignments can
simply be moved into AddInputDevice(). Purge RegisterOtherDevice() and
pretend it never happened.
*lalalalala*
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
After copying the unused_classes into the device, reset the original
pointer. Otherwise we have two pointers pointing to the same field and both
get freed on device removal.
Some classes already have this behaviour since 51c8fd69.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Same as the matching key functions. Buttons, like keys, can have two states
for down/up - one posted, one processed. Posted is set during event
generation (usually in the signal handler). Processed is set during event
processing when the event queue is emptied and events are being delivered to
the client.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
The modifier key count is maintained by the XKB layer and
increased/decreased for all modifiers that set state.
Test case, MD/SD modifier key count in comment:
1. keyboard 1: press and hold Shift_L # SD:1 MD:1
2. keyboard 2: press and release Shift_L # SD:1,0 MD:1,0
<class copy happens> # SD:1 MD:1
3. keyboard 1: release Shift_L # SD:0 MD:1
4. keyboard 1: press and release Shift_L # SD:1,0 MD:2,1
The modifier is now logically down on the MD but not on keyboard 1 or
keyboard 2.
XKB is layered in before the DIX, it increases/decreases the modifier key
count accordingly. In the above example, during (2), the MD gets the key
release and thus clears the modifier bit. (3) doesn't forward the release to
the MD because it is already cleared. The copy of modifierKeysDown when the
lastSlave changes however increases the counter for the held key. On (4),
the press and release are both forwarded to the MD, causing a offset by 1
and thus do not clear the logical modifier state.
X.Org Bug 25480 <http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25480>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
This patch was generated by the following Perl code:
perl -i -pe 's/([^_])return\s*\(\s*([^(]+?)\s*\)s*;(\s+(\n))?/$1return $2;$4/g;'
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net>
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp <jamey@minilop.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Many references to the WindowTable array already had the corresponding
screen pointer handy, which meant they usually looked like
"WindowTable[pScreen->myNum]". Adding a field to ScreenRec instead of
keeping this information in a parallel array simplifies those
expressions, and eliminates a MAXSCREENS-sized array.
Since dix uses this data, a screen private entry isn't appropriate.
xf86-video-dummy currently uses WindowTable, so it needs to be updated
to reflect this change.
Signed-off-by: Jamey Sharp <jamey@minilop.net>
Reviewed-by: Tiago Vignatti <tiago.vignatti@nokia.com>
Tested-by: Tiago Vignatti <tiago.vignatti@nokia.com> (i686 GNU/Linux)
Rather than always returning BadValue, associate an error status like
BadWindow with a resource type like RT_WINDOW, and return the
appropriate one for the requested type.
This patch only touches the core protocol resource types. Others still
return BadValue and need to be mapped appropriately.
dixLookupResourceByType can now return BadImplementation, if the caller
asked for a resource type that has not been allocated in the server.
Signed-off-by: Jamey Sharp <jamey@minilop.net>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Just let Dispatch() check for a noClientException, rather than making
every single dispatch procedure take care of it.
Signed-off-by: Jamey Sharp <jamey@minilop.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
The only remaining X-functions used in server are XNF*, the rest is converted to
plain alloc/calloc/realloc/free/strdup.
X* functions are still exported from server and x* macros are still defined in
header file, so both ABI and API are not affected by this change.
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
In the process, fixes a memory leak in CloseDevice, and an unchecked
memory allocation in InitializePredictableAccelerationProperties.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp <jamey@minilop.net>
Reintroduce a check which used to be there in the old
ProcessKeyboardEvent/ProcessPointerEvent codepath, which avoids us
recording events subject to a grab twice: once when it's first processed
in EnqueueEvent, and then again when it's thawed and being replayed.
This required a tiny amount of code motion to expose syncEvents.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
RECORD was disabled during the switch to internal events. This patch
modifies the record callback to work with internal events instead of
xEvents. The InternalEvents are converted to core/Xi events as needed.
Since record is a loadable extension, the EventTo* calls must be externed.
Signed-off-by: Chris Dekter <cdekter@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If the indicator flags have the XkbSLI_IsDefault bit set, the indicator map
and names aren't their own bit of memory but rather point into the
device->key->xkbInfo->desc structure. XkbCopySrvLedInfo knows about this and
leaves the pointers alone.
When copying the classes from the slave to the master, these pointers are
copied and still point to the dev->key class of the slave device. If the
slave device is removed, the memory becomes invalid and a call to modify
this data (e.g. XkbSetIndicators) may cause a deadlock.
The copying of dev->key relies on dev->kbdfeed to be already set up. Hence
the pointers need to be reset once _both_ kbdfeed and key have been copied
into the master device.
X.Org Bug 25640 <http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25640>
Fedora Bug 540584 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540584>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Subpixel data in data_frac is stored as FP32.32, hence we need to get that
down again before adding it to the current value.
Reported-by: Thomas Jaeger
Tested-by: Thomas Jaeger
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
For core and XI1 events, store the key_repeat flag in the sequence number
until TryClientEvents. The sequenceNumber is unset until TryClientEvents.
[Also thrown in, some random indentation changes. Thanks]
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Fixes crash if the first XISelectEvents has a zero sized event mask.
Fixes crash if the mask provided is larger than others->xi2mask[].
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
A missing break meant that ButtonPress would fall through into
ButtonRelease, but luckily it appears to have been completely harmless.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
DCEs are now processed when sent throught the master device, not when sent
through the slave device. This includes a removal of some un-used (or partly
used) fields in the DCE itself to something more self-explanatory.
TODO: if a device has events queued and its attachment is changed, the DCE
is silently dropped now. Instead, it should be generated as soon as the
first event after the attachment is sent.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The version in eventconvert.c was half broken and for some reason we ended
up with a second version in exevents.c (which works). Move it over to where
it belongs and call EventToXI2 instad of having a custom function for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If a new device posts an event while the DCE is in the queue, getting the
data from the device may result in invalid memory access.
X.Org Bug 23100 <http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23100>
Unlike Enter/Leave events generated by a device pushing the pointer around,
a device doesn't change focus all by itself. It's a result of a
SetInputFocus call, a window becoming unviewable or a grab activating. As
such, the sourceid for focus events is always the deviceid itself.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Use enum EventType instead of ints. This requires a load of default
cases in various switch statements to silence compiler warnings.
Reported-by: Aaron Plattner
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
InternalEvents shouldn't be used anywhere outside the X server itself. Split
up into events.h for opaque typedefs for the events needed by various
headers and eventstr.h for the actual struct definitions.
eventstr.h must only be included by code that requires internal events and
is not part of the SDK.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
New access modes are being passed to the device access hook for XI2:
DixCreateAccess for creating a new master device;
DixAdd/RemoveAccess for attaching/removing slave devices to a master; and
DixListProp/GetProp/SetPropAccess for device properties.
Refer to the XACE-Spec document in xorg-docs, section "Device Access."
Signed-off-by: Eamon Walsh <ewalsh@tycho.nsa.gov>
Master devices provide the union of all attached slave devices' buttons,
i.e. the number of buttons on the master device is always the number of
buttons of the slave device with the highest number of buttons. When slaves
are attached or detached, the master device adjusts the button number to
reflect the new buttons.
On a slave switch, this slave's button labels are copied into the master (up
to slave->num_buttons). The remaining button labels (if any) stay as they
are. Thus, if any of the higher buttons is still pressed, it reflects the
label of the last pressed device that provided this button.
If two devices press the same button and it is differently labelled the last
pressed one will be reflected in the master device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The previous code would always skip the last valuator due to a wrong
upper boundary in the loop. last_valuator is the index of the last set
valuator - which also means it must be initialized to -1, not 0.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Some files (notably those merged with MPX before XI2 came along) didn't use
a 'xi' prefix. This patch changes all of them to meaningful names.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
zero-length masks are supposed to clear the device's mask.
ProcXISelectEvents passes these masks through directly, so we need to clear
the bits here if such a mask is supplied.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If a passive enter or focus in grab activates, send additional enter or
focus events with mode XIPassiveGrabNotify to the grabbing client.
Likewise, if the grab deactivates, send additional leave or focus out
events.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Enter grabs are checked for in CheckMotion(), each time the sprite window
changes the current grab is deactivated (if applicable) and the new grab is
activated (if applicable). Exception - if the grab is on a parent window of
the current window since we keep the grab across descendants.
Since CheckMotion() may change the grab status of a device, we mustn't get
"dev->deviceGrab.grab" in ProcessOtherEvents until after CheckMotion().
FocusIn grabs are checked in much the same manner.
The event delivery for grabs replaces the NotifyNormal on window change with
a NotifyGrab on window change. Note that this happens before the grab
activates, so the EnterNotify(NotifyGrab) is still delivered to the window,
not to the grabbing client. This is in line with the core protocol semantics
for NotifyGrab events.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
In the case of a RevertToFollowKeyboard, the master device should be used
(since this is the closest equivalent to the VCK as before). Only if the
master keyboard is the same as the device, revert to the VCK itself.
This didn't use to be a problem when devices could only be pointers or
keyboards, not both. Nowadays, slave devices may have both buttons and
keyboards, and in this case we don't want to deactivate a passive keyboard
grab when a button release is detected.
There's devices (e.g. some barcode readers) that have axes but no buttons.
When such a device sends a motion event, the valuator and button class is
copied into the master pointer (i.e. removing the button class).
So we need a couple of extra sanity checks for the button class to exist.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Copying all classes into the master device has drawbacks for hybrid devices
(devices that are both mice and keyboards). If such a device posts an event,
it's key classes are moved into the VCP. The key event itself is unaffected
by keyboard grabs and the like.
Partial class copying copies depending on the event and copies the classes
into the right master device (i.e. the VCK for key events, the VCP for
pointer events).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
There's no need for internal events to be a struct with a single nested
union, we might as well make the union itself the InternalEvent.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
isMaster is not enough as long as we differ between master pointers and
keyboard. With flexible device classes, the usual checks for whether a
master device is a pointer (currently check for ->button, ->valuators or
->key) do not work as an SD may post an event through a master and mess this
check up.
Example, a device with valuators but no buttons would remove the button
class from the VCP and thus result in the
IsPointerDevice(inputInfo.pointer) == FALSE.
This will become worse in the future when new device classes are introduced
that aren't provided in the current system (e.g. a switch class).
This patch replaces isMaster with "type", one of SLAVE, MASTER_POINTER and
MASTER_KEYBOARD. All checks for dev->isMaster are replaced with an
IsMaster(dev).
dev->u.lastSlave was not signal safe since it was accessed by the DIX and
during signal handling.
Replaced with:
'dev->last.slave' for the signal handler's lastSlave (used to generate
DeviceChangedEvents), .
'dev->u.lastSlave' for the DIX lastSlave (currently only used in
change_modmap)
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Key events may change the modifier state, so we need to get the prev_state for
those (i.e. without the changes by the event already applied).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Some keyboards (?) advertise more than MAX_VALUATORS axes. Parts of the
internal event delivery relies on not having more than MAX_VALUATOR axes, so
let's cap it down.
If there's real devices that require more than the current 36, I'm sure we can
bump this up.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Daniel d'Andrada
Alan Coopersmith
Peter Hutterer
Chase Douglas
Keith Packard
Chase Douglas
Daniel Stone
Tiago Vignatti
Simon Thum
Eoghan Sherry
Mikhail Gusarov
Jamey Sharp
Chris Dekter
Jeremy Huddleston
Eamon Walsh