Make the code flow a bit easier to understand and allow further simplification
by now just having to write out one additional payload as one block.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Putting both payload pieces into one buffer, so it can be written out
with only one call.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
It's hard to see which fields of the xkbGetDeviceInfoReply struct it's
reading or writing, and that complicates further simplifications of the
caller. So instead let the caller pass in the relevant fields and do the
modifications on the reply structs on its own.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
A bit simplification in code flow.
The extra length check (did we write as much as intended?) isn't necessary,
since the buffer size is computed by the very same data before this
function is called.
Hint: the size computation must be done before calling this one, because
the reply might be encapsulated in another one (xkbGetKbdByName).
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
It's not passing back any data via that pointer and actually the last
consumer of it. Changing it to value instead of pointer clears the
road for further simplifications by subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Make it a bit simpler and easier to read.
calloc() and WriteToClient() can handle zero lengths very well.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
It's not passing back any data via that pointer and actually the last
consumer of it. Changing it to value instead of pointer clears the
road for further simplifications by subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
It's not passing back any data via that pointer and actually the last
consumer of it. Changing it to value instead of pointer clears the
road for further simplifications by subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
We don't need the whole struct here, especially do we not wanna change it.
Therefore only pass in what's really needed, so it gets easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
We don't need the whole struct here, especially do we not wanna change it.
Therefore only pass in what's really needed, so it gets easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
We don't need the whole struct here, especially do we not wanna change it.
Therefore only pass in what's really needed, so it gets easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
We don't need the whole struct here, especially do we not wanna change it.
Therefore only pass in what's really needed, so it gets easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
We don't need the whole struct here, especially do we not wanna change it.
Therefore only pass in what's really needed, so it gets easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
We don't need the whole struct here, especially do we not wanna change it.
Therefore only pass in what's really needed, so it gets easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
We don't need the whole struct here, especially do we not wanna change it.
Therefore only pass in what's really needed, so it gets easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Use static initializaton as much as possible and drop unnecessary
or duplicate zero assignments.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Only key difference that calloc(), in contrast to rellocarray(),
is zero-initializing. The overhead is hard to measure on today's
machines, and it's safer programming practise to always allocate
zero-initialized, so one can't forget to do it explicitly.
Cocci rule:
@@
expression COUNT;
expression LEN;
@@
- xallocarray(COUNT,LEN)
+ calloc(COUNT,LEN)
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
No need to hard-crash the whole server if some strdup() calls failing,
those fields already may be NULL, so consumers can handle that situation.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
No need for RunXkbComp() to hard-crash (by calling XNFstrdup()) the server
if strdup() fails to allocate more memory - it's callers already handling
the situation gracefully.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Using calloc() instead of malloc() as preventive measure, so there
never can be any hidden bugs or leaks due uninitialized memory.
The extra cost of using this compiler intrinsic should be practically
impossible to measure - in many cases a good compiler can even deduce
if certain areas really don't need to be zero'd (because they're written
to right after allocation) and create more efficient machine code.
The code pathes in question are pretty cold anyways, so it's probably
not worth even thinking about potential extra runtime costs.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Even though the cases might be hypothetical, it's still better having some
tiny extra checks (that might be even optimized-out) and reduce the analyzer
noise a bit.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
In the rare case that NULL kbd is passed and also no components provided,
the corresponding error message code crashes on NULL pointer dereference.
| ../xkb/ddxLoad.c: In function ‘XkbDDXLoadKeymapByNames’:
| ../xkb/ddxLoad.c:393:25: warning: dereference of NULL ‘keybd’ [CWE-476] [-Wanalyzer-null-dereference]
| 393 | keybd->name ? keybd->name : "(unnamed keyboard)");
| | ~~~~~^~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
The freeRules parameter is always set to TRUE, meaning always free the
XkbRF_RulesRec struct. Therefore also no need to clear out fields that
aren't going to be reused again, ever.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1840>
Allow the compiler to figure out the most efficient way to do the
struct initialization, and a little improvement on code readability.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1840>
The function is nothing more than a calloc() call, so we can spare
an actual function call here by making it static inline.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1840>
Handles common case of allocating & copying string to temporary buffer
(cherry picked from xorg/lib/libxkbfile@8a91517ca6ea77633476595b0eb5b213357c60e5)
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1821>
Fixes formatting of negative numbers, so they don't show minus sign
after the decimal point.
(cherry picked from xorg/lib/libxkbfile@d2ec504fec2550f4fd046e801b34317ef4a4bab9)
Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1821>
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Alan Coopersmith
Martin Burggraf