Wrapping ScreenRec's function pointers is problematic for many reasons, so
use the new window destructor hook instead.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Wrapping ScreenRec's function pointers is problematic for many reasons, so
use the new window destructor hook instead.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Wrapping ScreenRec's function pointers is problematic for many reasons, so
use the new window destructor hook instead.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Wrapping ScreenRec's function pointers is problematic for many reasons, so
use the new window destructor hook instead.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
This wrapping function for Screen->ResizeWindow() is does nothing more than
just call the original functions. So no need to keep wrapping it at all.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
This proc vector is optional (callers check for non-null) and neither fb nor
mi set it, so we can just assign our function directly. No need for wrapping.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
This proc vector is optional (callers check for non-null) and neither fb nor
mi set it, so we can just assign our function directly. No need for wrapping.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
This wrapping function for Screen->CopyWindow() is does nothing more than
just call the original functions. So no need to keep wrapping it at all.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Both engines, GDI as well as DirectDraw, using the same screen init finish function,
so no need to keep indirection via per-engine callback pointer.
The winFinishScreenInitFB() can also be made static now.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
It does nothing more than just calling the original/wrapped function,
so we don't need that at all.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
It does nothing more than just calling the original/wrapped function,
so we don't need that at all.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Even though the order of these fields shouldn't change anytime
soon, it's still better programming style to name'em explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Even though the order of these fields shouldn't change anytime
soon, it's still better programming style to name'em explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Even though the order of these fields shouldn't change anytime
soon, it's still better programming style to name'em explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Even though the order of these fields shouldn't change anytime
soon, it's still better programming style to name'em explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Even though the order of these fields shouldn't change anytime
soon, it's still better programming style to name'em explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Even though the order of these fields shouldn't change anytime
soon, it's still better programming style to name'em explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Even though the order of these fields shouldn't change anytime
soon, it's still better programming style to name'em explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Even though the order of these fields shouldn't change anytime
soon, it's still better programming style to name'em explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Even though the order of these fields shouldn't change anytime
soon, it's still better programming style to name'em explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Even though the order of these fields shouldn't change anytime
soon, it's still better programming style to name'em explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Even though the order of these fields shouldn't change anytime
soon, it's still better programming style to name'em explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Even though the order of these fields shouldn't change anytime
soon, it's still better programming style to name'em explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
<X11/Xdefs.h> is needed for `Bool` type.
Consumers shouldn't have to rely on Xdefs.h being accidentally included
by something else.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1782>
These functions are only used by the proprietary NVidia drivers,
so keeping them only for backwards compat. Nobody else should ever
really need them.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1773>
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Aki Sakurai
Spiky Caterpillar