Couldn't find a trace where it actually had been used, so there doesn't
seem to be any reason while still keeping it around.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1512>
Several places using _X_ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF macro from X11/Xfuncproto.h
but missing to include it, so it depends on other headers whether it's
included by mere accident, which quickly causes trouble if include order
changes. Cleaning that up by adding explicit include statements.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1580>
We can directly use calloc() as all other places do.
If we wanna have an convenient macro for struct allocation, that would be the
job of a separate patch queue and should be done consequently, treewide.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1586>
he generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
he generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
he generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
he generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
he generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
he generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
The generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
The generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
The generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
The generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
The generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
The secur.h doesn't need the symbols defined here (eg. Status or Display)
anymore, so no need to keep it around anymore.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1550>
Make sure everybody who needs stuff from <sys/mman.h> actually includes it,
and dropped the include from xf86_OSlib.h.
Check for all symbols defined by Open Group spec.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1412>
Since we already had to rename some of them, in order to fix name clashes
on win32, it's now time to rename all the remaining ones.
The old ones are still present as define's to the new ones, just for
backwards compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1355>
Windows' native headers using some our RT_* define's names for other things.
Since the naming isn't very nice anyways, introducing some new ones
(X11_RESTYPE_NONE, X11_RESTYPE_FONT, X11_RESTYPE_CURSOR) and define the old
ones as an alias to them, in case some out-of-tree code still uses them.
With thins change, we don't need to be so extremely careful about include
ordering and have explicit #undef's in order to prevent name clashes on
Win32 targets.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1355>
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult