If the device is already grabbed, don't activate the passive grab, it screws
with our event masks. Just deliver to the grabbing client instead.
Reported-by: Carlos Garnacho <carlosg@gnome.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Ownership changes don't get processed directly when they happen, instead the
DIX submits an ownership event which goes through ProcessTouchEvents and
ProcessTouchOwnershipEvents.
Then on the required events are generated and sent to clients.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Includes a hack for implicit grab activation, because integrating this
requires a larger rewrite and I'm not sleeping enough as it is.
Right now, we deliver the event and check before/after if there is an
implicit grab on. If one activated, then store the event in the grab and
switch the listener type to a grab listener.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Does not include pointer emulation handling.
Does include partial ownership handling but not the actual processing of
ownership events.
Note: this commit is a retroactive commit extracted from a series of ~50
commits and may thus appear a bit more complicated than what you'd write out
from scratch.
Pointer processing tree is roughly:
- ProcessOtherEvents
- ProcessTouchEvents
- DeliverTouchEvents
- DeliverTouchBeginEvent|DeliverTouchEndEvent|...
- DeliverOneTouchEvent
Also hooks up the event history playing to the right function now.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Co-authored-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Update the logical button state for pointer-emulating events. Button state
must be kept separate from the ButtonClassRec to avoid clearing the button
state on a touch end if there is a physical button still down.
And obviously don't change the button state if we're currently replaying the
event history for some client.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
These structs will be used to store touch-related data, events and
information.
Drivers must call InitTouchClassDeviceStruct to set up a multi-touch capable
device.
Touchpoints for the DDX and the DIX are handled separately - touchpoints
submitted by the driver/DDX will be stored in the DDXTouchPointInfoRec. Once
the touchpoints are processed by the DIX, new TouchPointInfoRecs are created
and stored. This process is already used for pointer events with the
last.valuators field.
Note that this patch does not actually add the generation of touch events,
only the required structs.
TouchListeners are (future) recipients of touch or emulated pointer events.
Each listener is in a state, depending which event they have already
received. The type of listener defines how the listener got to be one.
Co-authored-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
No-one can generated them yet, but if they could, we'd be processing them
like there was no tomorrow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
The are the same as device events internally but require the touch ID
separately from the detail.button field (the protocol uses the detail field
for the touch id).
For simpler integration of pointer emulation we need to set the
detail.button field while keeping the touchid around.
Add the three new touch event types to the various places in the server
where they need to be handled. The actual handling of the events is somewhat
more complicated in most places.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
All the DeepCopy stuff really needs to be shared between the init calls the
drivers use and this code here. Too many bugs by not keeping the two in
sync.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
They achieve the same thing, re-use the more generic InputLevel so we can
convert to/fro easier.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Functional change: for a button mapped to 0, the motionHintWindow is not
updated to the NullWindow anymore. Before it got updated unconditionally to
the button mapping. I have no idea what the practical effect of this is, but
I guess it's closer to the correct behaviour: pressing a button that's
logically disabled now does not disrupt the motion hint delivery.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
'state' is shadowed by the XKB 'state' as well (which feeds into the event
too), so rename this one to clarify that this is the core event state only.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Once grabs start having nested memory locations, we can't just use the
GrabRec on the stack anymore, we need to alloc/copy/free the grabs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Does what it says on the box, complements MakeInputMask.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Currently not needed since the InputClientRec is a self-contained struct. As
part of the touch rework that won't be the case in the future and a function
to allocate/free memory appropriately is required.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Wherever it's obvious which device we need (keyboard or pointer), use
GetMaster() instead of GetPairedDevice(). It is more reliable in actually
getting the device type we want.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
They don't have a KeyClassRec, but we must still allow passive grabs on
them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Tested-by: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
If we're sending the event for a given device, make sure the deviceid is
that of the device.
This allows callers to use the same DCE for slave and master without having
to fiddle the DCE's internal fields.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Instead of device and master (and just using master), drop the master
argument and let the callers pass in the device the event is to be sent for.
No effective functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
For scroll wheel support, we used to send buttons 4/5 and 6/7 for
horizontal/vertical positive/negative scroll events. For touchpads, we
really want more fine-grained scroll values. GetPointerEvents now
accepts both old-school scroll button presses, and new-style scroll axis
events, while emitting both types of events to support both old and new
clients.
This works with the new XIScrollClass to mark axes as scrolling axes.
Drivers mark any valuators that send scroll events with SetScrollValuator.
(Currently missing: the XIDeviceChangeEvent being sent when a driver changes
a scroll axis at run-time. This can be added later.)
Note: the SCROLL_TYPE enums are intentionally different values to the XI2
proto values to avoid copy/overlapping range bugs.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Relative axes are initialized with 0, -1 but so far this never had any
effect as all users of this function (for relative axes) just set it to the
defaults anyway.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Return errors instead of silently ignoring them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Change the DeviceEvent InternalEvent to use doubles for its valuators,
instead of data and data_frac.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
exevents.c: In function 'UpdateDeviceState':
exevents.c:719:9: warning: variable 'bit' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
exevents.c: In function 'ProcessOtherEvent':
exevents.c:889:22: warning: variable 'v' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
exevents.c:888:17: warning: variable 'k' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
No functional changes, prep work for future changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@apple.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@apple.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
The macro is sufficient if called during a development cycle, but not
sufficient information when triggered by a user (e.g.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688693).
Expand what this does to print the event content and a backtrace, so at
least we know where we're coming from. Only the first 32 bytes are printed
since if something goes wrong, the event we have is almost certainly an
xEvent or xError, both restricted to 32 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
commit 678f5396c9 only fixed the
initialization, not the copy. After a slave device change, the valuator
were out of alignment again.
X.Org Bug 36119 <http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36119>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@apple.com>
This removes the struct, but keeps InitAbsoluteClassDeviceStruct as
a no-op and preserves related struct layout.
Signed-off-by: Simon Thum <simon.thum@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is not a straightforward search/replacement due to a long-standing
issue.
dev->u.master is the same field as dev->u.lastSlave. Thus, if dev is a master
device, a check for dev->u.master may give us false positives and false
negatives.
The switch to IsFloating() spells out these cases and modifies the
conditions accordingly to cover both cases.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <tissoire@cena.fr>
These two were sideeffects of lastSlave being in the same field as the
master. For devices generated by the master device directly, lastSlave was 0
and the device would (with the old checks) be interpreted as floating.
Add the required checks to safeguard against master devices.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <tissoire@cena.fr>
When a client has selected for Xi 1.x DeviceStateNotify events, they
should receive them when a DeviceFocusIn event is generated. The code
to do this was there, but an incorrect test meant they were never being
sent.
The "type" passed in is the XI2 type, the XI1 type is in event.type.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
CheckDeviceGrabs will activate a passive grab for KeyPress and
ButtonPress events. GrabInfoRec::activatingKey contains the keycode
which activated the passive grab, so we can deactivate it later in
ProcessOtherEvents.
Previously, CheckDeviceGrabs relied on its callers to set
activatingKey, which not all callers were doing (I'm looking at you,
ComputeFreezes). Just set it in CheckDeviceGrabs instead.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Since FixUpEventFromWindow only uses the sprite trace to determine the
window stack, pass in a sprite instead of hardcoding the device sprite,
so we can deliver to windows other than the one currently containing the
sprite.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Peter Hutterer
Daniel Stone
Tiago Vignatti
Simon Thum