he generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
he generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
he generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
he generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
he generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
he generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
The generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
The generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
The generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
The generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
The generic XaceHook() call isn't typesafe (und unnecessarily slow).
Better add an explicit function, just like we already have for others.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1556>
There are no in-tree consumers of the audit hooks, and they are in any
case redundant with the dtrace dispatch hooks. Neither is there any
in-tree user of the core request dispatch hook. The extension hook is
only used for non-default security cases, but in the absence of LTO we
always have to take the function call into XaceHookDispatch to find out
that there's no callback registered.
Cc: Eamon Walsh <ewalsh@tycho.nsa.gov>
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Regression from 990cf5b282
Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Cc: Andrew Eikum <aeikum@codeweavers.com>
Cc: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Eikum <aeikum@codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Eikum <aeikum@codeweavers.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is strictly the application of the script 'x-indent-all.sh'
from util/modular. Compared to the patch that Daniel posted in
January, I've added a few indent flags:
-bap
-psl
-T PrivatePtr
-T pmWait
-T _XFUNCPROTOBEGIN
-T _XFUNCPROTOEND
-T _X_EXPORT
The typedefs were needed to make the output of sdksyms.sh match the
previous output, otherwise, the code is formatted badly enough that
sdksyms.sh generates incorrect output.
The generated code was compared with the previous version and found to
be essentially identical -- "assert" line numbers and BUILD_TIME were
the only differences found.
The comparison was done with this script:
dir1=$1
dir2=$2
for dir in $dir1 $dir2; do
(cd $dir && find . -name '*.o' | while read file; do
dir=`dirname $file`
base=`basename $file .o`
dump=$dir/$base.dump
objdump -d $file > $dump
done)
done
find $dir1 -name '*.dump' | while read dump; do
otherdump=`echo $dump | sed "s;$dir1;$dir2;"`
diff -u $dump $otherdump
done
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Acked-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
All symbols in installed sdk headers should be explicitly tagged
as exported symbols. Otherwise, to ensure it is not a mistake, one
could write it as something like:
extern /* NOEXPORT */ type name ...;
but the proper procedure really should be to use a non sdk header
(or a "noinst_" one).
This patch also removes prototypes to some functions that existed
only temporarily.
Save in a few special cases, _X_EXPORT should not be used in C source
files. Instead, it should be used in headers, and the proper C source
include that header. Some special cases are symbols that need to be
shared between modules, but not expected to be used by external drivers,
and symbols that are accessible via LoaderSymbol/dlopen.
This patch also adds conditionally some new sdk header files, depending
on extensions enabled. These files were added to match pattern for
other extensions/modules, that is, have the headers "deciding" symbol
visibility in the sdk. These headers are:
o Xext/panoramiXsrv.h, Xext/panoramiX.h
o fbpict.h (unconditionally)
o vidmodeproc.h
o mioverlay.h (unconditionally, used only by xaa)
o xfixes.h (unconditionally, symbols required by dri2)
LoaderSymbol and similar functions now don't have different prototypes,
in loaderProcs.h and xf86Module.h, so that both headers can be included,
without the need of defining IN_LOADER.
xf86NewInputDevice() device prototype readded to xf86Xinput.h, but
not exported (and with a comment about it).
To recap: the original XC-SECURITY extension disallowed background "None" if
the window was untrusted. XACE 1.0 preserved this check as a hook function.
XACE pre-2.0 removed the hook and first abolished background "None entirely,
then restored it as a global on/off switch in response to Bug #13683.
Now it's back to being per-window, via a flag instead of a hook function.
From the X11 protocol spec:
"If background None is specified, the window has no defined background."
This means that toolkits and apps cannot rely on the "transparent" nature
of the current implementation! At some point before the next release,
XACE will switch back to a solid background as the default.
Subject: [PATCH] fix some performance gaps in Xace
The XaceHook function is used in several hotpaths.
The problem with it (performance wise) is twofold:
* The XaceHook function has a big switch() statement for the hook number in it
* The XaceHook function uses varargs to reassemble the final dispatch arguments again
Both are expensive operations... for something that is known at compile time
This patch turns the hotpath XaceHook call into a direct call to avoid
the switch and varargs; this gives me over 10% performance gain
on the x11perf benchmark.
delivery of events to windows and clients.
This is tentative. It's likely that an additional last-resort hook will
be necessary for code that calls TryClientEvents or WriteEventsToClient
directly. It's also possible that new xace machinery will be necessary
to classify events and pull useful resource ID's out of them.
The failure case also needs some thinking through. Should event delivery
"succeed" or should it report undeliverable?
Finally, XKB appears to call WriteToClient to pass events. Sigh.
arbitrary X status codes instead of just TRUE/FALSE.
The dix layer in most cases still does not propagate the return value of
XACE hooks back to the client, however. There is more error propagation
work to do.
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Adam Jackson
Julien Cristau
Andrew Eikum
Keith Packard
Eamon Walsh
Paulo Cesar Pereira de Andrade
Adam Jackson