This doesn't change any behavior, but it isn't clear whether NullClient is correct in all cases. As ajax says, > For most of these changes, I think it's correct to use NullClient, > since they are server-initiated changes and should not fail for (eg) > xace reasons. ... At any rate, you're certainly not changing any > semantics by leaving them all as NullClient, so this patch can't be > more wrong than before. The call in CreateGC is particularly questionable. Signed-off-by: Jamey Sharp <jamey@minilop.net> Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| dmx | ||
| kdrive | ||
| vfb | ||
| xfree86 | ||
| xnest | ||
| xquartz | ||
| xwin | ||
| Makefile.am | ||